{ "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "contract_status": "preview", "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff", "no_write_operations": true, "canonical": { "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/focus-time", "slug": "focus-time", "locale": "en-US" }, "summary": { "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "term_id": "0738ae33-af01-5081-98ee-69ed6950e9ce", "canonical_slug": "focus-time", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/focus-time", "locale": "en-US", "display_name": "Focus Time", "english_name": null, "abbreviation": null, "short_definition": "Focus Time is a protected deep work block used for creating uninterrupted capacity for work that needs synthesis, design, writing, analysis, or difficult decisions.", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "last_reviewed_at": "2026-04-27T15:44:40.000Z", "sources_count": 2, "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "content": { "definition": { "key": "definition", "title": "一言でいうと", "text": "Focus Time is a protected deep work block used for creating uninterrupted capacity for work that needs synthesis, design, writing, analysis, or difficult decisions.", "items": [] }, "formula": null, "boundary": null, "usage": [ { "key": "meaning", "title": "意味", "text": "Focus Time is a protected block for cognitively demanding work where switching cost would damage quality, speed, or judgment. In practice it is used for creating uninterrupted capacity for work that needs synthesis, design, writing, analysis, or difficult decisions by making owners, boundaries, evidence, and review triggers explicit.", "items": [] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "役立つ場面", "text": "Focus Time changes decisions by making the owner, boundary, required evidence, and review trigger explicit before work proceeds. Focus Time helps teams decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work using evidence rather than meeting momentum. Focus Time reduces rework because assumptions, unresolved questions, and follow-up responsibilities are visible enough to challenge.", "items": [ "Focus Time changes decisions by making the owner, boundary, required evidence, and review trigger explicit before work proceeds.", "Focus Time helps teams decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work using evidence rather than meeting momentum.", "Focus Time reduces rework because assumptions, unresolved questions, and follow-up responsibilities are visible enough to challenge." ] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "使い方のポイント", "text": null, "items": [ "Define the decision question, accountable owner, and time horizon before using Focus Time as an operating artifact.", "Separate evidence from opinion so Focus Time supports judgment instead of decorating a preferred answer.", "Record what was accepted, what was deferred, and what signal would cause a future change in Focus Time.", "Use Focus Time to choose a management action, not merely to produce a tidy document or status label.", "Revise or retire Focus Time when the boundary, owner, evidence, or operating context changes materially." ] } ], "misunderstandings": [ { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "判断するときの注意点", "text": "Focus Time will not speed execution when ownership remains ambiguous. Focus Time becomes storage instead of a decision aid when it is too long to use. Focus Time needs change history or teams cannot reconstruct why the decision moved.", "items": [ "Focus Time will not speed execution when ownership remains ambiguous.", "Focus Time becomes storage instead of a decision aid when it is too long to use.", "Focus Time needs change history or teams cannot reconstruct why the decision moved." ] }, { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": null, "items": [ "Focus Time is not valuable because the label exists; it is valuable only when it changes a decision or execution behavior.", "More detail is not automatically better for Focus Time; the useful level is the one that clarifies ownership and review.", "Focus Time is not a one-time workshop output because the artifact must stay current while the decision remains live." ] } ], "examples": [ { "key": "examples", "title": "最小例", "text": "A team uses Focus Time after noticing that discussion keeps producing activity without a clear management decision. For Focus Time, the team defines the intended outcome, names one accountable owner, and lists the evidence that would change the decision. During the Focus Time review, the team compares current evidence with the recorded boundary, adjusts the scope, and assigns follow-through work. The Focus Time record now helps people see why the action was chosen, what risk was accepted, and when the decision should be revisited.", "items": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "key": "comparisons", "title": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Separate nearby terms by the decision each one supports. Time management | Allocates the calendar | Focus time protects one high-depth mode Bottleneck | Identifies the constraint | Focus time may be one remedy when attention is constrained Task management | Tracks commitments | Focus time creates capacity to finish them", "items": [ "Time management | Allocates the calendar | Focus time protects one high-depth mode", "Bottleneck | Identifies the constraint | Focus time may be one remedy when attention is constrained", "Task management | Tracks commitments | Focus time creates capacity to finish them" ] } ], "faq": [ { "question": "How long should focus time be?", "answer": "Long enough to pass the setup cost of the work, often 60 to 120 minutes for deep tasks." }, { "question": "Should everyone have the same schedule?", "answer": "No. Match the block to role, service expectations, and collaboration needs." }, { "question": "How is abuse prevented?", "answer": "Require visible outputs and clear intake rules for urgent issues." } ] }, "sources": { "source_refs": [ "concept:focus-time:en-US", "concept:focus-time:ja-JP", "catalog:concept:F-04-10" ], "visible_sources": [ { "label": "Principles of Management (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-management", "kind": "tier_s" }, { "label": "Wikipedia reference: Project Management", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_management", "kind": "supplemental" } ] }, "related_terms": [ { "topic_id": "674dec80-baec-539f-9eb0-629dff182ffa", "canonical_slug": "bottleneck", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/bottleneck", "title": "Bottleneck", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "fc078c49-7707-51d1-b204-549e3386ffd5", "canonical_slug": "task-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/task-management", "title": "Task Management", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "29b88fe1-8dd3-5c85-8782-5844a7ed80bb", "canonical_slug": "time-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/time-management", "title": "Time Management", "relation_type": "related" } ], "quality": { "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "source_count": 2, "last_reviewed_at": "2026-04-27T15:44:40.000Z", "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "limitations": { "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22", "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice", "text": "This page is reference information for research and learning. For accounting, legal, finance, health, security, or other individual decisions, confirm against primary sources or qualified professionals.", "items": [ "Public pages support general understanding and practical context; they are not professional advice for individual cases.", "Fast-changing information such as regulations, accounting standards, prices, product specs, and legal requirements should be checked against primary sources before final decisions.", "Even when AI-assisted drafting or audit is used, publication relies on quality gates and human-readable evidence." ] } }