{ "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "contract_status": "preview", "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff", "no_write_operations": true, "canonical": { "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/project", "slug": "project", "locale": "en-US" }, "summary": { "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "term_id": "0d2f83cf-0cfa-5e83-976d-e7d6919d6ff5", "canonical_slug": "project", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/project", "locale": "en-US", "display_name": "Project", "english_name": null, "abbreviation": null, "short_definition": "Project is a decision tool for turning delivery accountability into a concrete temporary delivery system.", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-10T00:00:00.000Z", "sources_count": 2, "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "content": { "definition": { "key": "definition", "title": "一言でいうと", "text": "Project is a decision tool for turning delivery accountability into a concrete temporary delivery system.", "items": [] }, "formula": null, "boundary": null, "usage": [ { "key": "meaning", "title": "意味", "text": "Project defines the working structure used when work is temporary, outcome-driven, cross-functional, and needs explicit scope, ownership, schedule, and governance. In Project, the important work is not the template itself; the page states the decision boundary, required evidence, owner, and review cadence. Used well, Project turns vague discussion into an auditable management choice and exposes trade-offs before resources are committed.", "items": [] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "役立つ場面", "text": "Project changes decisions by making delivery accountability visible before commitments are made. It helps leaders decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work based on evidence rather than meeting momentum. It reduces rework because assumptions, owners, and review points are explicit enough to challenge.", "items": [ "Project changes decisions by making delivery accountability visible before commitments are made.", "It helps leaders decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work based on evidence rather than meeting momentum.", "It reduces rework because assumptions, owners, and review points are explicit enough to challenge." ] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "使い方のポイント", "text": null, "items": [ "Define the decision, owner, and time horizon before filling in the temporary delivery system.", "Separate evidence from opinion so the tool supports judgment instead of decorating a preferred answer.", "Record assumptions and review dates because delivery accountability changes as the operating context changes.", "Use the output to choose a management action, not merely to produce a document.", "Retire or revise the tool when the decision boundary no longer matches the work." ] } ], "misunderstandings": [ { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "判断するときの注意点", "text": "The main risk is false precision: a neat temporary delivery system can hide weak evidence or political assumptions. Check whether the tool is describing reality or merely rationalizing a decision that has already been made. If the output does not change a priority, owner, resource level, or review date, the analysis is probably too soft.", "items": [ "The main risk is false precision: a neat temporary delivery system can hide weak evidence or political assumptions.", "Check whether the tool is describing reality or merely rationalizing a decision that has already been made.", "If the output does not change a priority, owner, resource level, or review date, the analysis is probably too soft." ] }, { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": null, "items": [ "Project is not the decision itself; it is a structure for making and reviewing the decision.", "More detail is not automatically better. For Project, the useful level is the one that changes a management action.", "A one-time workshop is not enough; the value comes from keeping the artifact current while the decision is live." ] } ], "examples": [ { "key": "examples", "title": "最小例", "text": "A leadership team uses Project because work is temporary, outcome-driven, cross-functional, and needs explicit scope, ownership, schedule, and governance. They draft the temporary delivery system, name one accountable owner, and list the evidence that would change the recommendation. During the Project review, one assumption proves weak, so the team narrows the scope and schedules a follow-up review. The Project decision record now shows the action taken, the risk accepted, and the signal that would trigger a change.", "items": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "key": "comparisons", "title": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Process | Repeats ongoing work | Project delivers a defined temporary outcome Program | Coordinates related projects | Project is the individual delivery unit Operation | Runs the business continuously | Project changes or creates part of the business", "items": [ "Process | Repeats ongoing work | Project delivers a defined temporary outcome", "Program | Coordinates related projects | Project is the individual delivery unit", "Operation | Runs the business continuously | Project changes or creates part of the business" ] } ], "faq": [ { "question": "What decision should Project support?", "answer": "Project should support a specific management choice: what to do, who owns it, what trade-off is accepted, and when the choice will be reviewed." }, { "question": "How detailed should the temporary delivery system be?", "answer": "Project should be detailed enough to expose assumptions, ownership, and evidence gaps, but not so detailed that the team stops making decisions." }, { "question": "How often should Project be updated?", "answer": "Update Project when material evidence changes, when ownership changes, or when the review cadence says the decision must be revisited." } ] }, "sources": { "source_refs": [ "concept:project-2:en-US", "concept:project-2:ja-JP", "concept:project:en-US", "concept:project:ja-JP", "manual_merge_map:next-exact-duplicates-2026-04-28" ], "visible_sources": [ { "label": "Principles of Management (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-of-management", "kind": "tier_s" }, { "label": "Wikipedia reference: Project", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project", "kind": "supplemental" } ] }, "related_terms": [ { "topic_id": "13cfe003-e593-5ca6-b3b4-457896cc065f", "canonical_slug": "work-breakdown-structure", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/work-breakdown-structure", "title": "Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "23808c1c-2534-5b05-b534-5e45eae0eabc", "canonical_slug": "raci-matrix", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/raci-matrix", "title": "RACI Matrix", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "04977a76-1418-5883-be32-c0c37e58ac32", "canonical_slug": "scope", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/scope", "title": "Scope", "relation_type": "related" } ], "quality": { "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "source_count": 2, "last_reviewed_at": "2026-05-10T00:00:00.000Z", "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "limitations": { "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22", "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice", "text": "This page is reference information for research and learning. For accounting, legal, finance, health, security, or other individual decisions, confirm against primary sources or qualified professionals.", "items": [ "Public pages support general understanding and practical context; they are not professional advice for individual cases.", "Fast-changing information such as regulations, accounting standards, prices, product specs, and legal requirements should be checked against primary sources before final decisions.", "Even when AI-assisted drafting or audit is used, publication relies on quality gates and human-readable evidence." ] } }