{ "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "version": "core-reviewed-term-ai-handoff-v1", "contract_status": "preview", "distribution": "per_term_read_only_ai_handoff", "no_write_operations": true, "canonical": { "url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/task-management", "slug": "task-management", "locale": "en-US" }, "summary": { "schema_version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "term_id": "fc078c49-7707-51d1-b204-549e3386ffd5", "canonical_slug": "task-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/task-management", "locale": "en-US", "display_name": "Task Management", "english_name": null, "abbreviation": null, "short_definition": "Task Management is a commitment flow control used for keeping execution reliable when many commitments compete for attention.", "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "version": "core-reviewed-term-summary-v1", "last_reviewed_at": "2026-04-27T15:44:40.000Z", "sources_count": 2, "limitations_key": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "content": { "definition": { "key": "definition", "title": "一言でいうと", "text": "Task Management is a commitment flow control used for keeping execution reliable when many commitments compete for attention.", "items": [] }, "formula": null, "boundary": null, "usage": [ { "key": "meaning", "title": "意味", "text": "Task Management is the system for turning commitments into visible work, owners, priorities, due dates, and completion evidence. In practice it is used for keeping execution reliable when many commitments compete for attention by making owners, boundaries, evidence, and review triggers explicit.", "items": [] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "役立つ場面", "text": "Task Management changes decisions by making the owner, boundary, required evidence, and review trigger explicit before work proceeds. Task Management helps teams decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work using evidence rather than meeting momentum. Task Management reduces rework because assumptions, unresolved questions, and follow-up responsibilities are visible enough to challenge.", "items": [ "Task Management changes decisions by making the owner, boundary, required evidence, and review trigger explicit before work proceeds.", "Task Management helps teams decide whether to start, stop, resize, or resequence work using evidence rather than meeting momentum.", "Task Management reduces rework because assumptions, unresolved questions, and follow-up responsibilities are visible enough to challenge." ] }, { "key": "usage", "title": "使い方のポイント", "text": null, "items": [ "Define the decision question, accountable owner, and time horizon before using Task Management as an operating artifact.", "Separate evidence from opinion so Task Management supports judgment instead of decorating a preferred answer.", "Record what was accepted, what was deferred, and what signal would cause a future change in Task Management.", "Use Task Management to choose a management action, not merely to produce a tidy document or status label.", "Revise or retire Task Management when the boundary, owner, evidence, or operating context changes materially." ] } ], "misunderstandings": [ { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "判断するときの注意点", "text": "Task Management will not speed execution when ownership remains ambiguous. Task Management becomes storage instead of a decision aid when it is too long to use. Task Management needs change history or teams cannot reconstruct why the decision moved.", "items": [ "Task Management will not speed execution when ownership remains ambiguous.", "Task Management becomes storage instead of a decision aid when it is too long to use.", "Task Management needs change history or teams cannot reconstruct why the decision moved." ] }, { "key": "misunderstandings", "title": "よくある誤解 / 落とし穴", "text": null, "items": [ "Task Management is not valuable because the label exists; it is valuable only when it changes a decision or execution behavior.", "More detail is not automatically better for Task Management; the useful level is the one that clarifies ownership and review.", "Task Management is not a one-time workshop output because the artifact must stay current while the decision remains live." ] } ], "examples": [ { "key": "examples", "title": "最小例", "text": "A team uses Task Management after noticing that discussion keeps producing activity without a clear management decision. For Task Management, the team defines the intended outcome, names one accountable owner, and lists the evidence that would change the decision. During the Task Management review, the team compares current evidence with the recorded boundary, adjusts the scope, and assigns follow-through work. The Task Management record now helps people see why the action was chosen, what risk was accepted, and when the decision should be revisited.", "items": [] } ], "comparisons": [ { "key": "comparisons", "title": "似ている言葉との違い", "text": "Separate nearby terms by the decision each one supports. Next action | Names the immediate move | Task management controls the broader commitment system Priority | Ranks what matters | Task management reveals whether priority is actually staffed Time management | Allocates attention | Task management shows what attention must serve", "items": [ "Next action | Names the immediate move | Task management controls the broader commitment system", "Priority | Ranks what matters | Task management reveals whether priority is actually staffed", "Time management | Allocates attention | Task management shows what attention must serve" ] } ], "faq": [ { "question": "What is the minimum task record?", "answer": "Owner, output, due date or trigger, dependency, and completion evidence." }, { "question": "How often should tasks be reviewed?", "answer": "Review at the cadence where blockers can still be fixed before commitments fail." }, { "question": "What is a common failure?", "answer": "Too many active tasks hide the few commitments that actually matter." } ] }, "sources": { "source_refs": [ "concept:task-management:en-US", "concept:task-management:ja-JP", "catalog:concept:F-04-02" ], "visible_sources": [ { "label": "Principles of Management (OpenStax)", "url": "https://openstax.org/details/books/principles-management", "kind": "tier_s" }, { "label": "Wikipedia reference: Project Management", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_management", "kind": "supplemental" } ] }, "related_terms": [ { "topic_id": "0a61b3e0-9651-5d4e-aafe-1045319955af", "canonical_slug": "priority", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/priority", "title": "Priority", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "29b88fe1-8dd3-5c85-8782-5844a7ed80bb", "canonical_slug": "time-management", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/time-management", "title": "Time Management", "relation_type": "used_together" }, { "topic_id": "abfafadb-91f2-599b-bf10-1552d20193e0", "canonical_slug": "next-action", "canonical_url": "https://core.yogoq.com/en-US/core/next-action", "title": "Next Action", "relation_type": "related" } ], "quality": { "quality": "reviewed", "publication_status": "published_reviewed", "source_count": 2, "last_reviewed_at": "2026-04-27T15:44:40.000Z", "trust_policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22" }, "limitations": { "policy_version": "core-trust-policy-v1-2026-06-22", "professional_advice_boundary": "reference_only_not_professional_advice", "text": "This page is reference information for research and learning. For accounting, legal, finance, health, security, or other individual decisions, confirm against primary sources or qualified professionals.", "items": [ "Public pages support general understanding and practical context; they are not professional advice for individual cases.", "Fast-changing information such as regulations, accounting standards, prices, product specs, and legal requirements should be checked against primary sources before final decisions.", "Even when AI-assisted drafting or audit is used, publication relies on quality gates and human-readable evidence." ] } }